ARE MODERN DAY MARRIAGES FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED

In 2023, the notion of marriage being labeled as a business gained significant attention and discussion, primarily sparked by a high-profile celebrity actor/singer case in the United States (We will not reveal the name of this person for legal reasons). The controversy emerged when a well-known figure made public allegations that their former spouse had entered into the marriage solely for financial gain. This revelation has reignited debates surrounding the motives and dynamics within marriages, prompting a detailed analysis of the concept.

Motivations and Expectations:

The claim that marriage is akin to a business transaction raises questions about the motivations and expectations people bring to the institution. Traditionally, marriage has been associated with love, companionship, and emotional connection. However, this recent event has brought attention to the possibility of financial motives being a primary driver for some individuals, highlighting a potential shift in societal values and priorities.

Financial Considerations:

The label of marriage as a business underscores the significant financial implications that can arise from the union. Beyond emotional and personal bonds, marriage involves the pooling of resources, joint financial decision-making, and potential legal ramifications in case of divorce. The financial aspects of marriage, such as shared assets, alimony, prenuptial agreements, and division of property, contribute to the perception of marriage as a transactional arrangement.

Contractual Nature:

Viewing marriage as a business transaction can lead to comparisons between marital relationships and formal business contracts. Marriage often involves legal agreements, such as prenuptial or postnuptial contracts, which outline the division of assets and potential financial settlements in case of divorce. This contractual aspect reinforces the notion that marriage entails certain rights, responsibilities, and financial obligations.

Power Dynamics:

To label marriage as a business brings attention to the power dynamics that may exist within relationships. In cases where one partner enters the marriage with financial advantages or seeks financial gain, an imbalance of power can occur. This can lead to issues of control, manipulation, and exploitation, which may contribute to the perception of marriage as a transactional arrangement rather than an equal partnership built on love and mutual respect.

Changing Societal Perspectives:

The public scrutiny of the celebrity case mentioned earlier reflects evolving societal perspectives on marriage. As financial independence and gender roles continue to shift, the expectations and motivations associated with marriage have transformed. Economic considerations, social status, and financial stability can influence people's decisions to marry or stay in a marriage. These shifting dynamics contribute to the broader narrative of marriage being viewed as a business arrangement.

Impact on Marriage Institution:

When marriage is widely labeled as a business, it can have several consequences for the institution itself. Public perception may shift, leading to increased cynicism about the authenticity of marriages and the prevalence of financial motives. This can result in challenges for couples seeking genuine emotional connection and trust, as they may face skepticism or doubt regarding their motivations. Additionally, the perception of marriage as a business may lead to increased emphasis on financial factors when choosing a partner, potentially overshadowing other important aspects, such as compatibility and shared values.

One can argue that most modern marriages are about money in some shape or form, especially when the husband or wife is obligated to pay for dowry or asked to contribute financially towards his or her in-laws economical upkeep. This is prevalent in South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. Though it is a traditional custom, it is still practiced and well alive in modern times. 

It is essential to note that while the celebrity case in question has sparked discussions, it represents an isolated incident within the broader context of marriage. Many couples still enter into marital unions based on love, companionship, and emotional connection, emphasizing the non-financial aspects of the relationship. However, the public's fascination with high-profile cases can contribute to the perception that marriage, at times, operates like a business.